<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MS-PRO :: Created By Music Supervisors For Music Supervisors &#187; International Federation of the Phonographic Industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.musicsupervisor.com/tag/international-federation-of-the-phonographic-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.musicsupervisor.com</link>
	<description>Created By Music Supervisors For Music Supervisors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 02:40:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>IFPI: Labels Investing $5 Billion Annually on Artists&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.musicsupervisor.com/ifpi-labels-investing-5-billion-annually-on-artists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.musicsupervisor.com/ifpi-labels-investing-5-billion-annually-on-artists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MS-Pro News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Federation of the Phonographic Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Record label]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.musicsupervisor.us/?p=1847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are labels &#8211; especially major labels &#8211; critical financiers of musical creativity?  That is a tough thesis to defend these days, especially against a backdrop of surging music supply and consumption among unsigned artists.  But record labels have played a major filtering and financing role in the past, and their pocketbooks have created some of the biggest superstars of modern [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are labels &#8211; especially major labels &#8211; critical financiers of musical creativity?  That is a tough thesis to defend these days, especially against a backdrop of surging music supply and consumption among unsigned artists.  But record labels have played a major filtering and financing role in the past, and their pocketbooks have created some of the biggest superstars of modern music history &#8211; starting at the stage of obscurity.<span id="more-1847"></span></p>
<p>But just how much investment is happening today?  The IFPI just released a report pegging current label investment at $5 billion annually, worldwide.  That is roughly 30 percent of broader revenues, a serious reinvestment on early-stage artist development and marketing.  On top of that, the IFPI estimates that labels commit more than $1 million to break artists into newer markets.  Money for advances, recordings, marketing and promotional activities are the largest expenses, often tipping hundreds-of-thousands of dollars, according to the group.</p>
<p>The findings are part of the just-published Investing in Music report.  The broader agenda is to promote anti-piracy measures, reaffirm the importance of labels to artists, and convince lawmakers that labels play an important role in the economy and culture.  &#8220;No other party comes close to the levels of investment committed by record companies to developing, nurturing and promoting talent,&#8221; said IFPI chief John Kennedy.  </p>
<p>But other parties are also starting to fill that role.  As the hype surrounding &#8216;DIY&#8217; dies down, artists are realizing that teams and financial support are important for growth, though the partner itself can vary. Indeed, labels are not the only ones capable of bankrolling talent, and artists have more sidekick options than ever before.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/01f09161-89f7-41dc-908b-444e39c30dd4/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=01f09161-89f7-41dc-908b-444e39c30dd4" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><br />
<script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script><br />
</span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.musicsupervisor.com/ifpi-labels-investing-5-billion-annually-on-artists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baidu Faces Fines Over Lyrics Infringement&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.musicsupervisor.com/baidu-faces-fines-over-lyrics-infringement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.musicsupervisor.com/baidu-faces-fines-over-lyrics-infringement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baidu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haidian District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Federation of the Phonographic Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Copyright Society of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People's Republic of China]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.musicsupervisor.us/?p=1802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chinese search giant Baidu has largely avoided penalties for song-related infringement, despite accusations of some nefarious deep-linking.  The typical &#8211; and usually successful &#8211; defense is that Baidu is merely a search engine, and not a host of infringing materials.  But that argument fell through in a recent, lyrics-related case involving MCSC (Music Copyright Society of China), according to details [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chinese search giant Baidu has largely avoided penalties for song-related infringement, despite accusations of some nefarious deep-linking.  The typical &#8211; and usually successful &#8211; defense is that Baidu is merely a search engine, and not a host of infringing materials.  But that argument fell through in a recent, lyrics-related case involving MCSC (Music Copyright Society of China), according to details emerging early Tuesday morning from China.<span id="more-1802"></span></p>
<p>The complaint involved 50 songs, and according to one Beijing-based source, the case focused on lyrics displayed alongside MP3 deeplinks within Baidu MP3.  The Beijing People&#8217;s Court for the Haidian District issued a modest fine of 50,000 yuan (5,371 euros, $7,324) plus 10,000 yuan (1,074 euros, $1,465) for litigation expenses.</p>
<p>The fine amount is mostly unimportant, though the local verdict offers hope for label groups like the IFPI, long frustrated by the search behemoth.  But this case goes beyond linking, and the presence of only local companies probably affected the outcome.  Furthermore, Baidu promised to appeal, and in the meantime, could alter its results presentation.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/f38d6927-65d9-4331-bc7d-5b237a3bc001/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=f38d6927-65d9-4331-bc7d-5b237a3bc001" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><br />
<script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script><br />
</span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.musicsupervisor.com/baidu-faces-fines-over-lyrics-infringement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

