<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MS-PRO :: Created By Music Supervisors For Music Supervisors &#187; Billboard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.musicsupervisor.com/tag/billboard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.musicsupervisor.com</link>
	<description>Created By Music Supervisors For Music Supervisors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 02:40:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>It Used to Be So Simple: BigChampagne Unveils the &#8220;Ultimate Chart&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.musicsupervisor.com/it-used-to-be-so-simple-bigchampagne-unveils-the-ultimate-chart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.musicsupervisor.com/it-used-to-be-so-simple-bigchampagne-unveils-the-ultimate-chart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ultimate Chart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.musicsupervisor.us/?p=2302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charts like the Billboard 200 made perfect sense in the 90s, but ten years later, measuring success is a very tricky affair. That was the motivation for the Ultimate Chart, an attempt by BigChampagne to rank artists and songs according to a broader number of metrics. It also represents an attempt to seriously challenge Soundscan, a yardstick that has plenty [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charts like the Billboard 200 made perfect sense in the 90s, but ten years later, measuring success is a very tricky affair.  That was the motivation for the Ultimate Chart, an attempt by BigChampagne to rank artists and songs according to a broader number of metrics.  It also represents an attempt to seriously challenge Soundscan, a yardstick that has plenty of critics in the direct-to-fan and independent communities.<span id="more-2302"></span></p>
<p>So what are these metrics?  Actual sales are of course a critical ingredient, but BigChampagne is also blending components like radio airplay, video and audio streaming, and friends on social networks.  The first chart to be hatched will be the Ultimate 100, which offers a direct jab at the long-running Hot 100.  But as part of an early morning pre-briefing, the company also told Digital Music News that an independent-oriented chart is also in the works (among others).</p>
<p>In other words, the Ultimate Chart is an evolution in progress.  According to BigChampagne CEO Eric Garland, the knobs will be subtly twiddled over time to accommodate a quickly changing terrain.  Garland will be officially splashing the Ultimate Chart this morning at New Music Seminar in New York.</p>
<p>And partners?  That is also theoretically a fluid list, though the current stable includes Yahoo Music, Amazon, iTunes, YouTube, Vevo, MySpace Music, Facebook, Twitter, MTV, Clear Channel, Mediabase, AOL Music, Napster, Zune, We Are Hunted, Last.fm, and more.  &#8220;We&#8217;re rewriting the top of the charts for the new music business and enlisting the help of its chief architects to surface the most popular music that the charts have overlooked,&#8221; Garland relayed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.musicsupervisor.com/it-used-to-be-so-simple-bigchampagne-unveils-the-ultimate-chart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SoundExchange Responds: Billboard, Check Your Math&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.musicsupervisor.com/soundexchange-responds-billboard-check-your-math/</link>
		<comments>http://www.musicsupervisor.com/soundexchange-responds-billboard-check-your-math/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.musicsupervisor.us/?p=1876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are streaming radio (non-interactive) royalties really in the toilet? Not according to SoundExchange, which is now challenging a report suggesting abysmal artist payouts. Earlier this month, Billboard (as syndicated through Reuters) pointed to near-zero payouts on recordings for non-interactive streams in the US, even for superstar artists. &#8220;The results show that of the more than 100 artists examined to compile [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are streaming radio (non-interactive) royalties really in the toilet?  Not according to SoundExchange, which is now challenging a report suggesting abysmal artist payouts.  <span id="more-1876"></span></p>
<p>Earlier this month, Billboard (as syndicated through Reuters) pointed to near-zero payouts on recordings for non-interactive streams in the US, even for superstar artists.  &#8220;The results show that of the more than 100 artists examined to compile the Money Makers list, only 10 made more than $2,000 from non-interactive streams in 2009, with Beyonce topping the list with an underwhelming $5,000,&#8221; the report asserted, while also showing paltry results on the interactive side as well (a separate discussion entirely).  Publishing royalties were not part of the calculation.</p>
<p>But is it really that bad?  In subsequent discussions with Digital Music News, SoundExchange executive director John Simson outlined a much different level of compensation.  &#8220;These numbers are quite a bit off,&#8221; Simson relayed.</p>
<p>How off?  According to SoundExchange tallies, a total of 1,602 artists were paid more than $2,000 in 2009, with 500 of those receiving more than $9,000.  Then, 4 cleared $100,000 last year, and more than 60 artists earned more than $50,000.  The amounts pertain specifically to royalties on recordings for non-interactive (ie, radio) streams in the US.</p>
<p>The reasons for the discrepancies are unclear.  Billboard told Digital Music News that Nielsen Soundscan was sourced for the data, suggesting more current releases and artists.  SoundExchange also engaged the publication, and was unable to determine a methodological explanation for the differences.  </p>
<p>Even stripping out legacy performances does little to explain.  &#8220;There is a very robust mix of current artists and legacy artists in our numbers. Webcasting is more current; satellite &#8230; has a larger legacy component; by removing satellite, we&#8217;ve removed that influence.&#8221;</p>
<p>SoundExchange is currently on-the-ground at SXSW, attempting to match an estimated $1 million in royalties to performing artists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.musicsupervisor.com/soundexchange-responds-billboard-check-your-math/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Apple Urging Labels to Reject Amazon MP3 &#8220;Daily Deals&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.musicsupervisor.com/report-apple-urging-labels-to-reject-amazon-mp3-daily-deals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.musicsupervisor.com/report-apple-urging-labels-to-reject-amazon-mp3-daily-deals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Antebellum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Record label]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.musicsupervisor.us/?p=1818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple has begun urging record labels not to participate in a discounted MP3 promotion offered by rival Amazon.com and withdrawing iTunes Store marketing support for some releases featured as Amazon &#8220;Daily Deals,&#8221; Billboard reported, citing sources. Amazon debuted its Daily Deal feature in June 2008, and has more recently been asking labels for a one-day exclusive on sales before an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple has begun urging record  labels not to participate in a discounted MP3 promotion offered by rival Amazon.com and withdrawing iTunes  Store marketing support for some releases featured as Amazon &#8220;Daily Deals,&#8221; Billboard reported, citing sources.<span id="more-1818"></span></p>
<p> Amazon debuted its Daily Deal feature in June 2008, and has more recently been asking labels for a one-day exclusive on  sales before an album&#8217;s official release date, as well as label marketing  support for the Daily Deal on an artist&#8217;s website and social media pages, the head  of sales at a major label told Billboard.</p>
<p> &#8220;When that happened, iTunes said, &#8216;Enough of that shit,&#8217;&#8221; the executive said. </p>
<p> Due to Apple&#8217;s pressure, sources told Billboard that label executives had decided not to promote recent  releases from Lady Antebellum and Ke$ha as Amazon Daily Deals. </p>
<p>Authored by Mark Hefflinger</p>
<div style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;" class="zemanta-pixie"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/71539e58-2a50-474c-a049-92182f6f7654/" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"><img style="border: medium none; float: right;" class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=71539e58-2a50-474c-a049-92182f6f7654" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script type="text/javascript" src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" defer="defer"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.musicsupervisor.com/report-apple-urging-labels-to-reject-amazon-mp3-daily-deals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

